Key Content Summary
- Implementation through 3 methods under Urban Development Act Article 21: expropriation, replotting, mixed
- Expropriation method: Fast project progress, possible high returns but large initial funding burden
- Replotting method: Reduced funding burden with landowner participation but prolonged consensus process
- Mixed method: Most preferred in practice - combines expropriation + replotting advantages
- Large-scale development like Gyeongju northern region KRW 3 trillion project expected to apply mixed method
Urban development projects are among the largest-scale projects in real estate development. These projects implemented under the Urban Development Act take various forms including residential land development, industrial land development, and mixed-use city development, with completely different profit structures depending on implementation methods.
Urban Development Act Article 21 stipulates three implementation methods: expropriation (or use), replotting, and mixed methods. Since each method has different legal structures and characteristics, selecting the appropriate method for project nature and scale is key to success.
The expropriation method has project implementers purchase (expropriate) all land within zones for development. It follows compensation procedures under the Land Compensation Act, with project implementers securing land ownership before developing and selling. Advantages include relatively fast project progress and direct capture of development profits by project implementers. Disadvantages include requiring large-scale initial funding for land purchases and potential difficulties in compensation negotiations with landowners.
The replotting method distributes post-development land (replotted land) to existing landowners. Since landowners participate in development, initial funding burden is reduced. However, requiring consensus from all landowners extends project duration. Empirically, replotting methods often take 1.5-2 times longer than expropriation methods.
The mixed method combines expropriation and replotting, most widely used in practice. It quickly secures core areas through expropriation while inducing landowner participation in peripheral areas through replotting. This balances funding burden and project speed, making it preferred for large-scale urban development projects.
A representative Gyeongju case is the northern region KRW 3 trillion economic industry revitalization project. This project is complex development including advanced industrial complexes, logistics infrastructure, and residential environment improvement, expected to apply mixed methods. Significant land price increases are expected around such large-scale projects, making advance permit securing and land securing strategies important.
Companies participating in urban development projects or operating businesses in adjacent areas must accurately understand the implementation method and progress stage of relevant projects. Different opportunities and risks are presented to companies at each stage including urban development zone designation, development plan establishment, and implementation plan approval.
Stay updated on permit & real estate trends
Get customized consultation from Isang's professional consultants.
Get Free Guide